Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2021 ; 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1696298

ABSTRACT

Social learning is an important part of the college experience. With the rapid transition from face-to-face to online courses after COVID-19, the instructors were challenged with creating an online learning environment that supports social interaction for students. This project investigates the use of technology for interaction by the instructors, and how the students adapted technologies that allowed them to keep their interactions alive in the online courses. A 15-minute online survey was designed at a large engineering school in the southwestern United States. The undergraduate and graduate students in engineering who were enrolled in STEM courses in summer 2020 were invited to complete the survey at the end of the summer. Due to the online nature of the summer semester, this survey included separate questions for the students who took synchronous or asynchronous courses. The survey included both qualitative and quantitative questions. This research paper explains the survey design and the type of results obtained from the survey. To assess the student interaction with instructors/Teaching Assistants and with other students in online courses, the students answered questions related to (i) technology/platforms used by their instructor, (ii) methods used by their instructor, (iii) how the students adapted their interaction in the online environment, (iv) average time spent interacting each week, and (v) the satisfaction ratings on a Likert scale. For comparing with face-to-face courses (pre-COVID-19), the students were also asked to explain their interaction with instructors/Teaching Assistants and with other students in the face-to-face courses taken in fall 2019, and the average time spent interacting each week. The demographic questions included the student classification, engineering major, gender, ethnicity, the highest level of education completed by parents, and whether they were an international student. The results from this survey will play an important role in our understanding of how the students adapt from face-to-face courses to the online learning environment. Zoom and eCampus were the most commonly used tools for interaction in online courses. The virtual study groups and live interaction were widely used methods for students to interact with each other in online courses. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021

2.
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2021 ; 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1695565

ABSTRACT

This work in progress research paper studied the use of technologies, platforms, and methods for interactions during the course and outside the course by the engineering students enrolled in the summer 2020 semester at a large Southwestern public research university. In March of 2020, this university migrated away from face-to-face teaching, like other institutions, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This migration resulted in the development of synchronous (remote) and asynchronous (fully online) courses that were offered to students through the remaining Spring and also the Summer semester of 2020. Previous studies have shown that student and faculty interaction along with student-student interaction have a net positive effect on student retention and learning. This study was designed to identify the tools-technology or platforms-and methods used for interaction in the summer 2020 courses. All students enrolled in engineering courses in summer 2020 were invited to take part in the survey. However, 315 students started the survey and only 93 respondents completed the survey fully. While there are useful data from the entire starter group, this study looked at the data generated by the 93 respondents who completed the survey. The student responses indicate that most faculty, whether teaching synchronously or asynchronously, supplemented their courses with some technology or platform that facilitated live interactions (Zoom, Google Meet, Blackboard Collaborate, Microsoft Teams). Even though the students were moderately satisfied with the technology/platforms and methods that were used, they showed a higher degree of satisfaction for courses that used active learning and other methods for student engagement. For social learning, the students used GroupMe, text messaging, or Zoom calls to interact with each other outside of class. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL